Sunday, December 23, 2012

Why belief in Hell really isn't very nice at all

There has been some discussion about the topic of Hell over at Psychology Today recently. You might even  say it's a hot topic! (Sorry.) Psychologist Nathan Heflick wrote about the psychological aspects of the subject and invited readers to share why they personally believe in Hell. Humanistic blogger Greg Henriques, took a more controversial line, and wrote an article stating that he finds it  rather objectionable when religious people go on about how people who don't believe in God are going to be sent to Hell for their impiety. He was even bold enough to say that if there actually is a loving God then he would never do such a cruel thing; either that or this God person is not a morally just being. Either way, telling people they are going to Hell is just plain not nice.

Image of Hell in the style of Bosch 

This article prompted a response from Christian blogger Michael Austin. He acknowledges that the idea that God sends people to Hell (or lets people go there, depending on your interpretation) does not seem all that nice. In fact, many Christians are "deeply troubled by the thought of people spending eternity in Hell." And as well they might be. If this doctrine were true, then most people who have ever lived will end up in this dreadful place. Even worse, if you are Christian, then you face the prospect that people you care deeply about - family members, friends, one's spouse - might share this dire fate. Honestly, how do they sleep at night?

Detail of "The Last Judgment" by Luca Signorelli

But I digress. Austin's particular concern is with how the doctrine of Hell can be reconciled with the goodness of God. Many critics of the doctrine, just like Greg Henriques mentioned earlier, have argued that it can't be. And jettisoning the doctrine apparently is not an option for good Christians. (Although, as Austin notes, some Christians have done exactly that.) Austin quotes C.S. Lewis on this point:
There is no doctrine which I would more willingly remove from Christianity than this, if it lay in my power. But it (1) has the full support of Scripture, and, (2) especially, of our Lord's own words; (3) it has always been held by Christendom [thus three arguments from authority]; and (4) it has the support of reason (sic!). 
 Christians don't get to pick and choose what they believe you know! Or do they? Austin finds some wiggle room. Enough room for considerable theological gymnastics in fact. His argument is that God does not actually send people to Hell. He simply honours their choice to be separate from him. What a nice guy God is, allowing people their choice of how to spend eternity. Hell is "not some sort of medieval torture chamber" but simply "separation from the ultimate source of joy, love, peace, and light." So Hell is actually a favour done by God in his goodness for those who actually want to spend eternity in the absence of joy, love, peace, and light. Because some people just don't want those things I suppose.

Well there are a few problems with this. The most obvious one concerns inconsistency. Austin quotes Lewis to the effect that belief in Hell is required by scripture, especially by the words of Jesus himself. Jesus apparently had a great deal to say about Hell and there are over 70 references to Hell attributed to him. Hell is most definitely referred to as a place of punishment, such as Matthew 25: 46:
And these shall go away into everlasting punishment.
There are lurid descriptions in the New Testament of the horrors awaiting the damned. The place is described as a "lake which burneth with fire and brimstone"  and there are repeated references to a "worm that dieth not" that presumably gnaws on the flesh of the damned. No, not a medieval torture chamber, medieval technology did not have the capacity to create lakes of molten sulphur or immortal worms.

Furthermore, according to the words of Jesus, sinners are cast into this place. Matthew 25: 30 for example is one of several references to people being thrown into Hell:
And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness...
According to Austin, God allows people to go into Hell voluntarily, but according to Jesus they are thrown there like prisoners. But Hell is somehow compatible with a loving God because in spite of all these scriptural references to punishment, torment, and being cast into fire like garbage, God has simply created this place so that unbelievers have somewhere to go after they die. This is like saying, "It's up to you really, if you don't want to spend eternity with me, you have everlasting punishment as an alternative. Just saying, don't want you to feel pressured at all."

What strikes me as odd about all this is that unbelievers do actually manage to experience a measure of joy, peace, love and so on while they are still alive in spite of not believing that these things come from God. So it is possible for people to be happy without God playing a role in their lives. So if God's wish is actually to accommodate people who don't believe in him because of his infinite goodness, then why not create a paradise world for unbelievers where they can be left in peace after they die? Like a nice planet somewhere, with green fields, sandy beaches and tropical islands in the sun where no-one has to do any work? Only thing is,  God won't be joining you, that's all. Surely being omnipotent that would be in his power? Why tell people that Hell is a horrible place of everlasting punishment full of immortal worms and lakes of fire when the intention is simply to provide people with an opt out from Heaven? Believers might counter-argue that even though unbelievers think they are happy without God, his presence is still somehow essential to their happiness, for reasons that are not at all clear. But if God really is omnipotent why can He not make it possible for people to be happy in his absence?

Consider an analogy. A loving father is preparing his will in order to provide for his children after he is gone. He knows that after he dies he will be absent from their lives but he wants them to be happy and prosperous anyway. Therefore, he makes preparations so that they will benefit from his legacy. According to believers, God knows that he will be absent from the lives of certain people after they die. Why cannot he make arrangements for them to benefit in his absence? Surely, if he is loving and good, he would do this.

A final point I find particularly irksome is the idea that people who do not believe simply do not want to be with God and are making a final choice not to be with him. What this assumes is that deep down unbelievers really do believe God is real, but are rejecting him for some unknown reason. I'm not just making this up, there are Christians who actually believe this. For example, creepy William Lane Craig (whom I have dealt with elsewhere) actually has this to say:
No one in the final analysis really fails to become a Christian because of lack of arguments; he fails to become a Christian because he loves darkness rather than light and wants nothing to do with God.

Ah, no. Christians seem to have a hard time grasping this, but when someone says that they do not believe in God, they mean they genuinely do not think God is real. Yet Christians seem to think that someone who chose not to believe in God while they were alive because they saw no reason to do so, will one day wake up in the afterlife, be confronted by God and go, "Oops there really is a God after all, but I love darkness so much I would rather spend an eternity in Hell than admit I made a mistake."

In summary, Christians justify believing in Hell based on scripture. Some, such as Michael Austin, want to argue that Hell is compatible with a good God who honours one's choices. But according to these same scriptures, God does not honour choices, he punishes people for making a choice he does not approve of. Furthermore, people who go on about how unbelievers are choosing to be separated from God really ought to make an effort to grasp what the concept of unbelief actually means. Therefore, no matter how Christian theologians bend over backwards to whitewash the concept, the doctrine of Hell remains as inhumane and illogical as ever. Really not nice at all.

Follow me on Facebook, Google Plus, or Twitter.

Further reading:

Interesting article on why even Heaven may not be so nice after all:

The Problem with Heaven - The A-Unicornist

Great video by QualiaSoup critiquing the concept: Hell: an excessive punishment 


  1. I HAVE AN OBJECTION. I am a christian. A 13 year old christian, Sir. And I have a strong objection to this. Allow me to share..

    God does not send us to hell just because we didn't believe in him, but my Christian God is a jealous God. He loves me and wants me enough and will forgive me over and over several times. So, from the beginning..

    Satan once WAS God's favorite angel, by the name of Lucifer. He wanted to rebel againts God, for which God punished him. BAsically, in anger at God, wants to take us away from him. God does not want this. He wants us to join him in his realm of Heaven. Therefore in his word, the Bible, he wants us to put faih in him, and have our belief unto him. But if you choose not to believe in him, you are sent to hell. And I think you are sent to Hell profoundly upon the fact God gave you the blessing of life, a world to live in, with everything you need, a world that sits in an existing universe. You have a God that loves you no matter the circumstances. One who sent his son to die upon the creudest of graves, to save you from going to Hell anyway!

    And for someone to throw that in disposal and not believing in the God that blessed such unto them is seemingly ungreatful. So God doesn't WANT to punish a human being, but that human has to understand that God hath given them an incredible Gift, and loves them beyond compare. God will do anything to bring you to him. And when you have pushed God completely aside, when you turn to come back, His arms are still open and waiting. Hell is the last punishment God WANTS to give you. But Hell is for the sexually immoral, the sinners, Satan's followers...none of those kinds of people are allowed to enter Heaven's gates. And some people are atheists as you are, but who knows, God may be especially gracious as he has always been and even take them into Heaven, because my God is a loving God.

    I'm sure you may be a kind, loving, compassionate person. But I feel those who saw Christianity and just thought belittling of it, really are a hint selfish, maybe ungreatful.

    I think you understand my point perhaps. Any question you ask me, I can answer...


    1. Dear Miss Cristiana,
      I was actually raised in a Christian family, went to Christian schools, and so was fully indoctrinated. So I am completely familiar with the dogmas that you present. Funnily enough I was aged 13 when I rejected the Christian religion. You asset a number of standard Christian beliefs about God and Satan but do not present any reasons why a thinking person would believe any of these things are actually true. Personally, I don't think there are any good reasons to believe that they are anything but ideas that people have made up and propagated as unquestionable articles of faith by religious leaders who try to manipulate people's emotions and discourage them from using their reason. A Muslim gentleman commented on another of my posts, saying that he was convinced that Allah was the true God, etc. He even admitted that he could not justify this belief logically, but talked about how it "felt right" to him, and that he thought God was guiding him to the truth. I am sure that you are sincere in your beliefs and are convinced that your version of God is the correct one. However, if, say, you ahd been brought up in the Jewish faith, you would probably be equally convinced that Judaism was the true religion, and that Christianity was a false teaching. Although you talk about the Christian teaching that Satan rebelled against God, and that's why he created Hell, consider that in the Old Testament, specifically the Book of Job, Satan is portrayed as one of God's servants who acts strictly under divine instructions. "Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them" (Job 1:6). According to modern Jewish teaching in fact: "There is not one example in the Jewish Scriptures where any angel, Satan included, ever opposes God’s will.
      In essence, Satan is an agent of God, and has no free will or independent existence."
      You present no evidence to support your views about Satan, so why should I give them any more credence than say the Jewish version? Christians claim to believe in the authority of the Bible, yet the Bible itself contradicts what you are saying.
      You claim that God is both loving and jealous. The character of Yahweh presented in the Old Testament is certainly jealous alright. In fact he orders his followers to kill without mercy anyone who worships another God, even if the person is a member of your own family (Deuteronomy 12:6-10). In fact he orders the death penalty for all sorts of bizarre reasons that make no sense today.
      I don't see any reason to believe that any sort of God exists. However, if there was a God capable of creating the universe, I hardly think he would go into fits of jealous rage just because people chose to believe one religion over another, particularly when offers no proof that any of them are actually true. I also don't think he would be so petty and cruel as to impose an eternity of punishment on people for acting on natural sexual desires that he endowed people with, or for any of a variety of "sins" that Christians imagine he finds so offensive. How could any "sin" be so terrible that it deserves infinite punishment? Particularly, when God supposedly had foreknowledge of what people are going to do. If that were the case, he would have created people knowing in advance that he was going to consign them to ever-lasting torture. The idea that such actions would be committed by a supposedly all-good, and all-loving being is yet another contradiction within Christianity, one among many.
      One final point in closing. The idea that a person can be considered ungrateful to a being they do not believe in is absurd. If someone told me that I should be grateful to Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny for the gifts they have left me, I would think they had lost their wits. I know this is hard for Christians to seriously understand, but some people actually do not believe in God any more than you believe in Zeus or Krishna.

    2. I just wanted to add that the source of the Jewish quote about Satan is: Who is Satan?.
      More about murder in the bible can be viewed here.